64-Bits Failover Cluster with two instances

We have xSeries 460(x3950-8878) IBM Machine , mounted at win2003 and sql 2005
64-bits.
At future processes, this machine will take over all distributed database
with many application.
The failover clauster is configured with Active/Active node and I read about
reconfigure processor and I/O Affinity and memory at sp_configure procedure
to measure up or , perhaps take a base line to avoid series problems about
performance.
so, any help, article or step-by-step to guide our future away.
Thanks.
Kris
Message posted via http://www.droptable.com
More Information:
Both machine have 128GB Ram and 32 processor (dual core).
Krisnamourt wrote:
>We have xSeries 460(x3950-8878) IBM Machine , mounted at win2003 and sql 2005
>64-bits.
>At future processes, this machine will take over all distributed database
>with many application.
>The failover clauster is configured with Active/Active node and I read about
>reconfigure processor and I/O Affinity and memory at sp_configure procedure
>to measure up or , perhaps take a base line to avoid series problems about
>performance.
>so, any help, article or step-by-step to guide our future away.
>Thanks.
>Kris
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/sql-server-clustering/200707/1

64 Bit and 32 Bit Reporting Servers in same web farm

Can I mix 64 Bit and 32 Bit Reporting Servers in same web farm? I currently have a distributed environment with 2 32 Bit Web Servers and a 32 Bit Reporting Services Database server. I would like to add 64 Bit web servers to this configuration. Are there any issues with this?

This wasn't really a tested scenario, but I think in theory it should work. I mean I don't see anything in the RS product code that prevents you from doing so. It's always interesting when a theory is put to test though :).

If you decide to go down this route, let us know any problems you find.