Showing posts with label msde. Show all posts
Showing posts with label msde. Show all posts

Thursday, March 8, 2012

7.00.1078_enu.exe on msde

Hello does anyone know how to apply this patch on msde. I am getting
the rootkit.h in some of my servers and this patch requires to run
some querys. thanks.Hi

Has Sp4 been installed on those MSDE Instances?

What is the SELECT @.@.version for them?

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/sp4.asp

--
----------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland

IM: mike@.epprecht.net

MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp

Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/

<jcharth@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115245790.849461.5680@.o13g2000cwo.googlegrou ps.com...
> Hello does anyone know how to apply this patch on msde. I am getting
> the rootkit.h in some of my servers and this patch requires to run
> some querys. thanks.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

64-bit MSDE?

I've seen references in Microsoft online material to a 64-bit
edition of MSDE - the description of Windows XP 64-bit
Edition Version 2003 refers to it, for example. However,
I haven't been able to find any more information about the
existence, if any, and availability of 64-bit MSDE. I'm
specifically intererested in determining whether it's
available for the server operating system editions .
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Peter Hornby
Unisys Corporation
Mission Viejo
hi Peter,
"Pete Hornby" <peter.hornby@.unisys.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:umltR66KEHA.644@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've seen references in Microsoft online material to a 64-bit
> edition of MSDE - the description of Windows XP 64-bit
> Edition Version 2003 refers to it, for example. However,
> I haven't been able to find any more information about the
> existence, if any, and availability of 64-bit MSDE. I'm
> specifically intererested in determining whether it's
> available for the server operating system editions .
AFAIK, only the Enterprise Edition is available in the 64bit flavour..
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat...ew/default.asp and
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/64bit/default.asp
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.7.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.53.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
|||"Andrea Montanari" <andrea.sqlDMO@.virgilio.it> wrote in message
news:c6jga9$cocpm$1@.ID-207518.news.uni-berlin.de...
> hi Peter,
> "Pete Hornby" <peter.hornby@.unisys.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:umltR66KEHA.644@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> AFAIK, only the Enterprise Edition is available in the 64bit flavour..
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat...ew/default.asp and
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/64bit/default.asp
Andrea,
Many thanks for your quick response. I accept what you say, but I
remain confused by the statement - admittedly a year old - in
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/6...uation/faq.asp
where the answer to "What's New In Windows XP 64-Bit Edition
Version 2003" includes the line "Microsoft SQL Server Desktop
Engine (MSDE)".
Peter
|||hi Peter,
"Pete Hornby" <peter.hornby@.unisys.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:c6jll6$17ca$1@.si05.rsvl.unisys.com...
> Many thanks for your quick response. I accept what you say, but I
> remain confused by the statement - admittedly a year old - in
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/6...uation/faq.asp
> where the answer to "What's New In Windows XP 64-Bit Edition
> Version 2003" includes the line "Microsoft SQL Server Desktop
> Engine (MSDE)".
as IIS 6.0, I think that MSDE 2000 will be (or is) provided in the 32bit
flavour =:-)
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.7.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.53.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply

Sunday, February 19, 2012

5-workload limit

Hi, does anyone has practical problem when exceeding the
5-workload limit of MSDE. Please tell me about it what
errors you get or how slow will performance degrade.
Maybe how you solve this. Tnx!
Hi Aldrin,
You won't get any errors when you exceed the 5-workload limit. When you
exceed this limit it will be logged in the SQL Server error log though. The
message in the error log will state that there were more than 8 concurrent
workloads, as 3 workloads have been reserved for the system to use.
Performance will drop of when you have more than 5 concurrent workloads, but
it will not be dramatically until you reach about 20 concurrent workloads as
far as I know. Of course it might be different on your system, so the best
thing you can do is test your own system with the maximum number of
workloads you expect to find out if you still get the performance you need.
You can find more information about the workload governor in the following
Knowledge Base article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/?u...asp?frame=true
Jacco Schalkwijk
SQL Server MVP
"Aldrin" <aldrin@.wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:1bb5f01c42130$c45925a0$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi, does anyone has practical problem when exceeding the
> 5-workload limit of MSDE. Please tell me about it what
> errors you get or how slow will performance degrade.
> Maybe how you solve this. Tnx!
|||Thank you Jacco,
Now we're more sure to start with MSDE as backend (with
Delphi as frontend)! Not afraid anymore that everything
will stop or so. We will test this off course as you
wrote.
Greetings,
Aldrin

>--Original Message--
>Hi Aldrin,
>You won't get any errors when you exceed the 5-workload
limit. When you
>exceed this limit it will be logged in the SQL Server
error log though. The
>message in the error log will state that there were more
than 8 concurrent
>workloads, as 3 workloads have been reserved for the
system to use.
>Performance will drop of when you have more than 5
concurrent workloads, but
>it will not be dramatically until you reach about 20
concurrent workloads as
>far as I know. Of course it might be different on your
system, so the best
>thing you can do is test your own system with the
maximum number of
>workloads you expect to find out if you still get the
performance you need.
>You can find more information about the workload
governor in the following
>Knowledge Base article:
>
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/?url=/library/en-
us/architec/8_ar_sa2_0ciq.asp?frame=true[color=darkblue]
>--
>Jacco Schalkwijk
>SQL Server MVP
>
>"Aldrin" <aldrin@.wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
>news:1bb5f01c42130$c45925a0$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
the
>
>.
>

Thursday, February 16, 2012

5, 8 or 25 concurents workloads ?

Hello,
I'm usng MSDE2000A (not MSDE2000)
The MSDE2000 documentation speak about 5 concurents
operations limitation.
The "Approriate uses of MSDE Faq" speak about 25
concurents users (means concurents operations?)
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp
(see the "Can I use MSDE as a database for Web
applications?" question)
The SQL Server 2000 Workload Governor speak about 8
concurents operations
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp
Who's right? What's the exact number limitation for
MSDE2000A? 8 or 5 or 25 ?
Thanks for reply.
Georges
Thanks for posting this question...
I was myself confused after reading all this.. but after clarification from many posts out here, it seems that the workload governer kicks in after 5 concurrent operations (3 are reserved for the system, so total is 8)..
But the verdict of the people using MSDE is that it seems to work fairly well even if the number of concurrent operations goes till 25 and above.. you'll just have to test you system.
Hope it helps.
dev
"Georges" wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm usng MSDE2000A (not MSDE2000)
> The MSDE2000 documentation speak about 5 concurents
> operations limitation.
> The "Approriate uses of MSDE Faq" speak about 25
> concurents users (means concurents operations?)
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp
> (see the "Can I use MSDE as a database for Web
> applications?" question)
> The SQL Server 2000 Workload Governor speak about 8
> concurents operations
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp
> Who's right? What's the exact number limitation for
> MSDE2000A? 8 or 5 or 25 ?
> Thanks for reply.
> Georges
>
|||The governor is intended to kick in when there are 5 concurrent *USER*
workloads (a workload is NOT the same concept as a user/connection).
The 8 that you see referenced is because there are 3 workloads allotted for
system activity (designed so that the system can continue to do work even if
5 workloads are tying up the system).
The 25 that you see referenced is 25 concurrent users, not concurrent
workloads. Even with 25 users connected to the database, it is unlikely ,
unless you have really inefficient queries (in which case you probably won't
notice the governor anyway). As dev_kh stated, you'll have to test your
system to see if (a) the governor kicks in at all, and (b) whether its
effect is tolerable.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...r_sa2_0ciq.asp
All of this confusion is one of the primary reasons the governor was removed
in SQL Server 2005 Express, I think.
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Georges" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:133701c46f12$14ae53c0$a501280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
> I'm usng MSDE2000A (not MSDE2000)
> The MSDE2000 documentation speak about 5 concurents
> operations limitation.
> The "Approriate uses of MSDE Faq" speak about 25
> concurents users (means concurents operations?)
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp
> (see the "Can I use MSDE as a database for Web
> applications?" question)
> The SQL Server 2000 Workload Governor speak about 8
> concurents operations
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp
> Who's right? What's the exact number limitation for
> MSDE2000A? 8 or 5 or 25 ?
> Thanks for reply.
> Georges
|||I thought that MSDE had a limit of 10 concurrent users? Is it 25?
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
news:%23q8AjzybEHA.2660@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> The governor is intended to kick in when there are 5 concurrent *USER*
> workloads (a workload is NOT the same concept as a user/connection).
> The 8 that you see referenced is because there are 3 workloads allotted
for
> system activity (designed so that the system can continue to do work even
if
> 5 workloads are tying up the system).
> The 25 that you see referenced is 25 concurrent users, not concurrent
> workloads. Even with 25 users connected to the database, it is unlikely ,
> unless you have really inefficient queries (in which case you probably
won't
> notice the governor anyway). As dev_kh stated, you'll have to test your
> system to see if (a) the governor kicks in at all, and (b) whether its
> effect is tolerable.
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...r_sa2_0ciq.asp
> All of this confusion is one of the primary reasons the governor was
removed
> in SQL Server 2005 Express, I think.
> --
> http://www.aspfaq.com/
> (Reverse address to reply.)
>
>
> "Georges" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:133701c46f12$14ae53c0$a501280a@.phx.gbl...
>
|||> I thought that MSDE had a limit of 10 concurrent users? Is it 25?
No, it is neither. As I tried to explain, MSDE doesn't have a limit on
concurrent users at all (not 5, not 8, not 10, not 25, not 5000). There is
a governor that throttles performance at or around 5 simultaneous workloads,
which is *NOT* the same as a connection.
The 25 was a *suggestion* on one of the product pages, for how many
concurrent users a typical system running MSDE could support. This could be
completely different from project to project, as hardware, application code,
usage, bandwidth, database design etc. can differ, and all of these things
impact how an application performs. So you will need to test it out to see
how many simultaneous users and/or workloads your specific scenario can
support.
To provide an analogy for the difference between a concurrent user and a
concurrent workload. Imagine yourself at the DMV, and there are 40 people
waiting around, not doing much. Two people are at the registration counter,
and one person is getting her picture taken for a new drivers' license. The
40 people are "concurrent users" and the other three are "concurrent
workloads" - since they're the only ones actually doing anything productive.
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
|||ahhh - thanks!
love the DMV analogy, btw :-)
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
news:%23Bqzmw%23bEHA.1144@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> No, it is neither. As I tried to explain, MSDE doesn't have a limit on
> concurrent users at all (not 5, not 8, not 10, not 25, not 5000). There
is
> a governor that throttles performance at or around 5 simultaneous
workloads,
> which is *NOT* the same as a connection.
> The 25 was a *suggestion* on one of the product pages, for how many
> concurrent users a typical system running MSDE could support. This could
be
> completely different from project to project, as hardware, application
code,
> usage, bandwidth, database design etc. can differ, and all of these things
> impact how an application performs. So you will need to test it out to
see
> how many simultaneous users and/or workloads your specific scenario can
> support.
> To provide an analogy for the difference between a concurrent user and a
> concurrent workload. Imagine yourself at the DMV, and there are 40 people
> waiting around, not doing much. Two people are at the registration
counter,
> and one person is getting her picture taken for a new drivers' license.
The
> 40 people are "concurrent users" and the other three are "concurrent
> workloads" - since they're the only ones actually doing anything
productive.
> --
> http://www.aspfaq.com/
> (Reverse address to reply.)
>
|||> love the DMV analogy, btw :-)
Yeah, I was hoping you were in the US; most others wouldn't get it. ;-)
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
|||> most others wouldn't get it. ;-)
Just to be clear, I don't mean the concept (I think it's pretty clear even
if you replace DMV with McDonald's or the tax office or your human resources
department).
I mean the irony of talking about the DMV in terms of performance and
workload governing. Most of the locations I have been to have an unlimited
concurrent user threshold, but the staff has a concurrent workload limit of
exactly 1. ;-)
A

5 User License

Hi,
What exactly does the 5 user(s) license of MSDE means?
"sa" is a user and i can have only 4 more users, does that means total 5
users license?
Or its the number of users connected to MSDE at any given point of time?
Reetesh.
hi Reetesh,
"Reetesh B. Chhatpar" <reetesh@.widesystems.com> ha scritto nel
messaggio news:OZsTAvI1EHA.1408@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
> Hi,
> What exactly does the 5 user(s) license of MSDE means?
> "sa" is a user and i can have only 4 more users, does that means
> total 5 users license?
> Or its the number of users connected to MSDE at any given point of
> time?
> Reetesh.
MSDE does not have a "5 users license" limitation... MSDE includes a
Governor Workloads that kicks in when 8 of more concurrent workloads
activities (batches that include the operations as described in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/?u...asp?frame=true)
are executed and slows all of them down, but more workloads are supported
and only slowed down...
AFAIK, no such a limitation exists, nor technical or legal..
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.9.1 - DbaMgr ver 0.55.1
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
|||Hi Andrea,
The article was really worth reading. Thanks for clearing up my doubt for
MSDE. Could you also please share with me the licensing logic for SQL
Server. How do i cut-cost my product installation when I choose backend as
SQL?
Reetesh B. Chhatpar
ShawMan Software Enterprises
www.shawmansoftware.com
Diamond is just another piece of coal that did well under pressure.
"Andrea Montanari" <andrea.sqlDMO@.virgilio.it> wrote in message
news:30rjstF346j3iU1@.uni-berlin.de...
> hi Reetesh,
> "Reetesh B. Chhatpar" <reetesh@.widesystems.com> ha scritto nel
> messaggio news:OZsTAvI1EHA.1408@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
> MSDE does not have a "5 users license" limitation... MSDE includes a
> Governor Workloads that kicks in when 8 of more concurrent workloads
> activities (batches that include the operations as described in
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/?u...asp?frame=true)
> are executed and slows all of them down, but more workloads are supported
> and only slowed down...
> AFAIK, no such a limitation exists, nor technical or legal..
> --
> Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
> http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
> DbaMgr2k ver 0.9.1 - DbaMgr ver 0.55.1
> (my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
> interface)
> -- remove DMO to reply
>
|||hi Reetesh,
"Reetesh B. Chhatpar" <reetesh@.widesystems.com> ha scritto nel
messaggio news:%230kNRzQ1EHA.2540@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
> Hi Andrea,
> The article was really worth reading. Thanks for clearing up my doubt
> for MSDE. Could you also please share with me the licensing logic for
> SQL Server. How do i cut-cost my product installation when I choose
> backend as SQL?
in order to optimze your license fees, perhaps you've better have a call
with a Microsoft representative, as this really is a big deal and i'm not a
lawyer :D
if you choose MSDE (as per MSDE Release A package), your only need is to
register for distribution
(http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/ho...stregister.asp) , no other
requirement is necessary, for you nor for your customers... theoretical max
number of simultaneos connections stays at 32767 but, at 8 concurrent
workloads the Governor will kick in...
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.9.1 - DbaMgr ver 0.55.1
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply