70-444... Case studies, or...?

Took and passed the 70-443 yesterday morning, now just need the 70-444 to complete the MCITP: DBA cert... Was wondering if anybody out there knew if the 70-444 exam used the case study format or ...? Couldn't find that info on http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-444.mspx.

Thanks.

Justin

Never mind. Took (and passed) the test yesterday morning. I'll consider the lack of replies to my original message a sign that this was something that's not supposed to be discussed, so I suppose I shouldn't mention anything about the format myself.

Good luck to anybody else taking it.

Justin, now with MCITP goodness.

|||

Congrats!

So tell me, what format was the test?

Did it have multiple choice & simulation?

Was it case studies like the 70-443?

Thanks!

64-bit Windows/64-bit SQL - External Drives

Hi,
I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
confirmation anywhere.
Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
restrictions on hardware?
If we want use 64-bit clustered system, are we basically forced to accept a
fibre-based SAN as I/O system?
Thank you.
CraigYour hardware for Cluster must be in the Hardware Compatibility List. Check
out the following site:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309395
--
Ekrem Ã?nsoy
"craig_amtdatatechnologies@.discussions.mi"
<craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsmi@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:25BEEEE9-2C79-4377-83D5-CAA0574273B2@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
> that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
> I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
> confirmation anywhere.
> Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
> restrictions on hardware?
> If we want use 64-bit clustered system, are we basically forced to accept
> a
> fibre-based SAN as I/O system?
>
> Thank you.
> Craig
>

64-bit Windows / 64-bit SQL - External Disk Array (cluster)

oops, post should have gone to this forum ....
Hi,
I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
confirmation anywhere.
Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
restrictions on hardware?
If we want to go 64-bit, are we basically forced to accept a fibre-based SAN
as I/O system?
Thank you.
Craig
Windows 2003 64-bit does not require fibre drives. You can use anything
internal for the nodes. The shared disk can be Parallel Attached SCSI
(though I would not), iSCSI or SAN based.
Now Windows 2008 will not support PAS, but it will support SAS, SAN, or
iSCSI.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"craig_amtdatatechnologies@.discussions.mi"
<craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsmi@.discussions .microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:B1B0C4B4-B45D-4217-AC25-3A2D7A4B362B@.microsoft.com...
> oops, post should have gone to this forum ....
> Hi,
> I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
> that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
> I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
> confirmation anywhere.
> Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
> restrictions on hardware?
> If we want to go 64-bit, are we basically forced to accept a fibre-based
> SAN
> as I/O system?
>
> Thank you.
> Craig
|||Thanks for reply re: this
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" wrote:

> Windows 2003 64-bit does not require fibre drives. You can use anything
> internal for the nodes. The shared disk can be Parallel Attached SCSI
> (though I would not), iSCSI or SAN based.
>
> Now Windows 2008 will not support PAS, but it will support SAS, SAN, or
> iSCSI.
> Cheers,
> Rodney R. Fournier
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
>
> "craig_amtdatatechnologies@.discussions.mi"
> <craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsmi@.discussions .microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:B1B0C4B4-B45D-4217-AC25-3A2D7A4B362B@.microsoft.com...
>
>