Showing posts with label exam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exam. Show all posts

Sunday, March 11, 2012

70-431 SQL Server 2005 exam

hi there,

i am planning to take the exam 70431 for sql server 2005 ...does any one have a good exam and course material either online or it will be great if it could be emailed to me.

Thanks in advance

You can google Sql Server 2005 exam materials from website and will get a lot.Besides this,SQL Server 2005 online help is a good one for you.

|||

i tried already !!

i could not see FREE material there either exam or course material ... if you get luck in google :) ...please send me the links

Thanks for the reply

|||

If you are not in a hurry the book used by SQL Server people is by Robert Vierra but if you are take the second link and fill it in as the third link is from MSDN and you have a study guide or just print it out with the developer edition or Enterprise installed run searches in the BOL. And remember to understand the recursive trigger because Microsoft is known to give you four almost identical triggers with nothing more than space missing. And the index structure have changed know the whole thing because indexes are vendors creations all improvements are very important, when you are through with the material get Transcenders exams because the material is not the exam. If you know how to take the exam you are almost there. Hope this helps.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0764584340/002-6732392-4240017?v=glance&n=283155

http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-431.asp

http://www.codeclinic.com/70-229skills.htm

70-431 Exam Question

I just took the 70-431 exam the other day and did not pass. As a matter of
fact I failed miserably, mostly on the simulation questions (which this was
my first experience with those types of questions). Now I know I am not that
dumb, have been using SQL for almost 10 years and passed the same type of
exam for SQL 7 a few years back.
My question.... in the simulation questions are you marked down for things
such as 1) time to answer a question 2) hitting areas of the simulation that
do not apply (hence the message that the part I was trying to hit was not
valid for that simulation). When I first saw these questions I noticed I
could try alot of things and I went a little "click-happy" to see what did
and did not work before I answered the question which I suspect absolutly
KILLED me.
Also, any advice in order for me to prepare for the re-take would be greatly
appreciated. I should be able to pass this thing with some effort.
Thanks!
-Richard K
In article <Opvl7JDvHHA.4648@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
mark@.markNOSPAMrae.net says...
> These "certifications" are totally and utterly worthless...
>
if that is true -- and after 10 years as a technical trainer, hiring
manager and DBA I would seriously disagree with you -- the reason it
would be true is folks like you recommending illegal brain dumps.
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu
|||In article <e3$cD6QvHHA.4784@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>,
mark@.markNOSPAMrae.net says...
> I don't recommend them any more than I recommend MCP "certification" - I
> merely cite them as an illustration of the the total worthlessness of MCPs,
> since anyone with not the slightest clue about the technology in question
> can simply pay a small amount of money, download the entire question pool,
> learn them parrot-fashion and pass the "test".
>
used to be truer when the exam pool was primarily multiple guess, but
with the advent of simulations and design testlets it is far more
difficult. Plus you may not be aware of some significant actions taken
by M'soft and the training community to address the problem, up to and
including permanent de-certification. Is it solved -- no but the
trajectory is in the right direction
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu

70-431 Exam Question

I just took the 70-431 exam the other day and did not pass. As a matter of
fact I failed miserably, mostly on the simulation questions (which this was
my first experience with those types of questions). Now I know I am not tha
t
dumb, have been using SQL for almost 10 years and passed the same type of
exam for SQL 7 a few years back.
My question.... in the simulation questions are you marked down for things
such as 1) time to answer a question 2) hitting areas of the simulation that
do not apply (hence the message that the part I was trying to hit was not
valid for that simulation). When I first saw these questions I noticed I
could try alot of things and I went a little "click-happy" to see what did
and did not work before I answered the question which I suspect absolutly
KILLED me.
Also, any advice in order for me to prepare for the re-take would be greatly
appreciated. I should be able to pass this thing with some effort.
Thanks!
-Richard KRichard - I'd recommend the Transcender preparation exams (even though I
disagreed with several answers). I didn't use anything else to prepare and
got something like 950 on 70-431. In the Transcender test you get zero for a
partially complete answer which might relate to your experience on the
simulations - I'm not too sure. If you do go for the Transcenders, get in
touch with their marketing dept as they often have special offers that'll
save you $100 or so if you time your purchase right.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison|||"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
news:uT8nRLCvHHA.4512@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Richard - I'd recommend the Transcender preparation exams (even though I
> disagreed with several answers). I didn't use anything else to prepare
> and got something like 950 on 70-431. In the Transcender test you get zero
> for a partially complete answer which might relate to your experience on
> the simulations - I'm not too sure. If you do go for the Transcenders, get
> in touch with their marketing dept as they often have special offers
> that'll save you $100 or so if you time your purchase right.
Alternatively, just download the entire set of questions and learn them
parrot-fashion the night before you sit the "test"...
http://www.examcheets.com/
It will cost you $16 (that's SIXTEEN DOLLARS) and will take you a couple of
hours...
These "certifications" are totally and utterly worthless...
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net|||Mark - the thing with the more recent SQL exams is that they largely can't
be learned parrot-fashion (esp 70-443). The exam style has changed a fair
bit and there are enough simulations/scenarios to make cheating like this
(fortunately) more difficult. I omitted to mention that I had been using SQL
2005 for 1.5 years before doing the exams - what I was getting at is that
for preparation on the exam type, Transcender is the best out there. So,
admittedly it's not all down to knowledge and I agree that exam technique
can still make a disproportionately big difference - eg there are still far
too many questions where in a list of options the most recent SQL technology
is always going to be the correct answer!
Cheers,
Paul|||In article <Opvl7JDvHHA.4648@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
mark@.markNOSPAMrae.net says...
> These "certifications" are totally and utterly worthless...
>
if that is true -- and after 10 years as a technical trainer, hiring
manager and DBA I would seriously disagree with you -- the reason it
would be true is folks like you recommending illegal brain dumps.
--
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu|||"Pete Berry" <PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu> wrote in message
news:MPG.20f304289e174897989691@.msnews.microsoft.com...

> if that is true
IMO, yes.

> and after 10 years as a technical trainer, hiring
> manager and DBA I would seriously disagree with you
That's fine.

> the reason it would be true is folks like you recommending illegal brain
> dumps.
I don't recommend them any more than I recommend MCP "certification" - I
merely cite them as an illustration of the the total worthlessness of MCPs,
since anyone with not the slightest clue about the technology in question
can simply pay a small amount of money, download the entire question pool,
learn them parrot-fashion and pass the "test".
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net|||In article <e3$cD6QvHHA.4784@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>,
mark@.markNOSPAMrae.net says...
> I don't recommend them any more than I recommend MCP "certification" - I
> merely cite them as an illustration of the the total worthlessness of MCPs
,
> since anyone with not the slightest clue about the technology in question
> can simply pay a small amount of money, download the entire question pool,
> learn them parrot-fashion and pass the "test".
>
used to be truer when the exam pool was primarily multiple guess, but
with the advent of simulations and design testlets it is far more
difficult. Plus you may not be aware of some significant actions taken
by M'soft and the training community to address the problem, up to and
including permanent de-certification. Is it solved -- no but the
trajectory is in the right direction
--
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu

70-431 Exam Question

I just took the 70-431 exam the other day and did not pass. As a matter of
fact I failed miserably, mostly on the simulation questions (which this was
my first experience with those types of questions). Now I know I am not that
dumb, have been using SQL for almost 10 years and passed the same type of
exam for SQL 7 a few years back.
My question.... in the simulation questions are you marked down for things
such as 1) time to answer a question 2) hitting areas of the simulation that
do not apply (hence the message that the part I was trying to hit was not
valid for that simulation). When I first saw these questions I noticed I
could try alot of things and I went a little "click-happy" to see what did
and did not work before I answered the question which I suspect absolutly
KILLED me.
Also, any advice in order for me to prepare for the re-take would be greatly
appreciated. I should be able to pass this thing with some effort.
Thanks!
-Richard KRichard - I'd recommend the Transcender preparation exams (even though I
disagreed with several answers:)). I didn't use anything else to prepare and
got something like 950 on 70-431. In the Transcender test you get zero for a
partially complete answer which might relate to your experience on the
simulations - I'm not too sure. If you do go for the Transcenders, get in
touch with their marketing dept as they often have special offers that'll
save you $100 or so if you time your purchase right.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison|||"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
news:uT8nRLCvHHA.4512@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Richard - I'd recommend the Transcender preparation exams (even though I
> disagreed with several answers:)). I didn't use anything else to prepare
> and got something like 950 on 70-431. In the Transcender test you get zero
> for a partially complete answer which might relate to your experience on
> the simulations - I'm not too sure. If you do go for the Transcenders, get
> in touch with their marketing dept as they often have special offers
> that'll save you $100 or so if you time your purchase right.
Alternatively, just download the entire set of questions and learn them
parrot-fashion the night before you sit the "test"...
http://www.examcheets.com/
It will cost you $16 (that's SIXTEEN DOLLARS) and will take you a couple of
hours...
These "certifications" are totally and utterly worthless...
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net|||Mark - the thing with the more recent SQL exams is that they largely can't
be learned parrot-fashion (esp 70-443). The exam style has changed a fair
bit and there are enough simulations/scenarios to make cheating like this
(fortunately) more difficult. I omitted to mention that I had been using SQL
2005 for 1.5 years before doing the exams - what I was getting at is that
for preparation on the exam type, Transcender is the best out there. So,
admittedly it's not all down to knowledge and I agree that exam technique
can still make a disproportionately big difference - eg there are still far
too many questions where in a list of options the most recent SQL technology
is always going to be the correct answer!
Cheers,
Paul|||In article <Opvl7JDvHHA.4648@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
mark@.markNOSPAMrae.net says...
> These "certifications" are totally and utterly worthless...
>
if that is true -- and after 10 years as a technical trainer, hiring
manager and DBA I would seriously disagree with you -- the reason it
would be true is folks like you recommending illegal brain dumps.
--
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu|||"Pete Berry" <PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu> wrote in message
news:MPG.20f304289e174897989691@.msnews.microsoft.com...
>> These "certifications" are totally and utterly worthless...
> if that is true
IMO, yes.
> and after 10 years as a technical trainer, hiring
> manager and DBA I would seriously disagree with you
That's fine.
> the reason it would be true is folks like you recommending illegal brain
> dumps.
I don't recommend them any more than I recommend MCP "certification" - I
merely cite them as an illustration of the the total worthlessness of MCPs,
since anyone with not the slightest clue about the technology in question
can simply pay a small amount of money, download the entire question pool,
learn them parrot-fashion and pass the "test".
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net|||In article <e3$cD6QvHHA.4784@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>,
mark@.markNOSPAMrae.net says...
> I don't recommend them any more than I recommend MCP "certification" - I
> merely cite them as an illustration of the the total worthlessness of MCPs,
> since anyone with not the slightest clue about the technology in question
> can simply pay a small amount of money, download the entire question pool,
> learn them parrot-fashion and pass the "test".
>
used to be truer when the exam pool was primarily multiple guess, but
with the advent of simulations and design testlets it is far more
difficult. Plus you may not be aware of some significant actions taken
by M'soft and the training community to address the problem, up to and
including permanent de-certification. Is it solved -- no but the
trajectory is in the right direction
--
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu

Thursday, March 8, 2012

70-431 (MCTS - SQL 2005)

Hi,

Somebody can speak (tips) about exam 70-431?

Tips?

Amount Questions?

Time ?

....

If you're looking for brain dumps this is not the site to get those answers. The 70-431 exam is a 200-level "how-to" exam on all the nuts and bolts of SQL Server 2005. There are free eLearning classes available on the Microsoft web site which will help you with the content information for the test, as well as a number of excellent books hitting the market about now.

I believe you'll get about 40 questions on the test, though it may be higher than that, and you'll get about 2 1/2 hours to answer them.

Go to www.microsoft.com/sql and click on Learning and you'll find out all you need to know to prepare for the test.

Good luck.

|||

What is the passing mark/percentage for MCTS?

|||

Hi Gunny,

is 700 scored.

|||

E X A M S P E C S
Exam Number: 70-431
Active / Retired: Active
Prerequisites:
Exam Format: Multiple-Choice; Multiple Answer
Num Questions: 55
Time Limit: 90
Cost (USD) $: $125
Passing Score: 700

taken from cramsession's site: http://www.cramsession.com/certifications/exams/sql-server-2005.asp?exam_id=770

also use this code for 20% of the exam price

Call now to schedule your Microsoft exam call 1-800-247-8731 and use code MSUU5C7E0100 for your 20% discount.

|||

Many thanks WPH and rkohler.

That's 700 out of how many? What is the max possible score?

|||1000 max scored.|||

Thanks WPH.

|||

any one can respon

i have two server one is dpmain controller and second is exchange 2003 server i need to setup sql 2005

which one i choice ?

|||

a.m.m.e.

Your question really belongs in a separate/new thread. This thread is about MCTS.

But to answer your question, I would advise against putting it on the domain controller. The domain controller contains the Active Directory and security is extremely important. Adding any other role such as SQL Server would complicate security configuration for it.

Actually, if possible, I would set up a new dedicated SQL Server - not add it to the Exchange Server 2003. Mixing multiple roles on one server always complicates security. But if you cannot set up a new dedicated server I would add it to the Exchange Server 2003.

Other more experienced people may have different ideas.

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Thanks for the information. I'm going to be taking the test soon and was afraid they would do something like this. They did this to me on the 70-228... completely changed the content and format from what my rather expensive test prep materials were based on.

Could you give us a clue as to what the simulations focused on? (ie. TSQL, SSMS, etc.) I can do just about everything you need to do in SSMS and other GUI tools, but I don't have all the full syntaxes for the TSQL methods memorized (ie. create HTTP endpoint for SOAP vs. TCP endpoint for mirroring).

|||

Well, this really isn't a database documentation request, and using a questions-only site really isn't the best way to go. There are reputable firms, such as Transcender, that will help you with testing and so on. The point is that you should try and learn the trade, rather than just memorizing questions. I've posted an article that deals with certifications:

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=131

And another here dealing with being a DBA. I think you may find those more useful than looking up test questions on a site.

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=247

These are just my thoughts - I do wish you luck in your studies!

|||

Many thanks, Abdul, for that "heads up".

If you or anyone else here come to know of any test exams based on this new pattern I am sure we all would be eager to know about them as soon as possible.

Regards

70-431 (MCTS - SQL 2005)

Hi,

Somebody can speak (tips) about exam 70-431?

Tips?

Amount Questions?

Time ?

....

If you're looking for brain dumps this is not the site to get those answers. The 70-431 exam is a 200-level "how-to" exam on all the nuts and bolts of SQL Server 2005. There are free eLearning classes available on the Microsoft web site which will help you with the content information for the test, as well as a number of excellent books hitting the market about now.

I believe you'll get about 40 questions on the test, though it may be higher than that, and you'll get about 2 1/2 hours to answer them.

Go to www.microsoft.com/sql and click on Learning and you'll find out all you need to know to prepare for the test.

Good luck.

|||

What is the passing mark/percentage for MCTS?

|||

Hi Gunny,

is 700 scored.

|||
E X A M S P E C S
Exam Number: 70-431
Active / Retired: Active
Prerequisites:
Exam Format: Multiple-Choice; Multiple Answer
Num Questions: 55
Time Limit: 90
Cost (USD) $: $125
Passing Score: 700

taken from cramsession's site: http://www.cramsession.com/certifications/exams/sql-server-2005.asp?exam_id=770

also use this code for 20% of the exam price

Call now to schedule your Microsoft exam call 1-800-247-8731 and use code MSUU5C7E0100 for your 20% discount.

|||

Many thanks WPH and rkohler.

That's 700 out of how many? What is the max possible score?

|||1000 max scored.|||

Thanks WPH.

|||

any one can respon

i have two server one is dpmain controller and second is exchange 2003 server i need to setup sql 2005

which one i choice ?

|||

a.m.m.e.

Your question really belongs in a separate/new thread. This thread is about MCTS.

But to answer your question, I would advise against putting it on the domain controller. The domain controller contains the Active Directory and security is extremely important. Adding any other role such as SQL Server would complicate security configuration for it.

Actually, if possible, I would set up a new dedicated SQL Server - not add it to the Exchange Server 2003. Mixing multiple roles on one server always complicates security. But if you cannot set up a new dedicated server I would add it to the Exchange Server 2003.

Other more experienced people may have different ideas.

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Thanks for the information. I'm going to be taking the test soon and was afraid they would do something like this. They did this to me on the 70-228... completely changed the content and format from what my rather expensive test prep materials were based on.

Could you give us a clue as to what the simulations focused on? (ie. TSQL, SSMS, etc.) I can do just about everything you need to do in SSMS and other GUI tools, but I don't have all the full syntaxes for the TSQL methods memorized (ie. create HTTP endpoint for SOAP vs. TCP endpoint for mirroring).

|||

Well, this really isn't a database documentation request, and using a questions-only site really isn't the best way to go. There are reputable firms, such as Transcender, that will help you with testing and so on. The point is that you should try and learn the trade, rather than just memorizing questions. I've posted an article that deals with certifications:

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=131

And another here dealing with being a DBA. I think you may find those more useful than looking up test questions on a site.

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=247

These are just my thoughts - I do wish you luck in your studies!

|||

Many thanks, Abdul, for that "heads up".

If you or anyone else here come to know of any test exams based on this new pattern I am sure we all would be eager to know about them as soon as possible.

Regards

70-431 (MCTS - SQL 2005)

Hi,

Somebody can speak (tips) about exam 70-431?

Tips?

Amount Questions?

Time ?

....

If you're looking for brain dumps this is not the site to get those answers. The 70-431 exam is a 200-level "how-to" exam on all the nuts and bolts of SQL Server 2005. There are free eLearning classes available on the Microsoft web site which will help you with the content information for the test, as well as a number of excellent books hitting the market about now.

I believe you'll get about 40 questions on the test, though it may be higher than that, and you'll get about 2 1/2 hours to answer them.

Go to www.microsoft.com/sql and click on Learning and you'll find out all you need to know to prepare for the test.

Good luck.

|||

What is the passing mark/percentage for MCTS?

|||

Hi Gunny,

is 700 scored.

|||

E X A M S P E C S
Exam Number: 70-431
Active / Retired: Active
Prerequisites:
Exam Format: Multiple-Choice; Multiple Answer
Num Questions: 55
Time Limit: 90
Cost (USD) $: $125
Passing Score: 700

taken from cramsession's site: http://www.cramsession.com/certifications/exams/sql-server-2005.asp?exam_id=770

also use this code for 20% of the exam price

Call now to schedule your Microsoft exam call 1-800-247-8731 and use code MSUU5C7E0100 for your 20% discount.

|||

Many thanks WPH and rkohler.

That's 700 out of how many? What is the max possible score?

|||1000 max scored.|||

Thanks WPH.

|||

any one can respon

i have two server one is dpmain controller and second is exchange 2003 server i need to setup sql 2005

which one i choice ?

|||

a.m.m.e.

Your question really belongs in a separate/new thread. This thread is about MCTS.

But to answer your question, I would advise against putting it on the domain controller. The domain controller contains the Active Directory and security is extremely important. Adding any other role such as SQL Server would complicate security configuration for it.

Actually, if possible, I would set up a new dedicated SQL Server - not add it to the Exchange Server 2003. Mixing multiple roles on one server always complicates security. But if you cannot set up a new dedicated server I would add it to the Exchange Server 2003.

Other more experienced people may have different ideas.

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Thanks for the information. I'm going to be taking the test soon and was afraid they would do something like this. They did this to me on the 70-228... completely changed the content and format from what my rather expensive test prep materials were based on.

Could you give us a clue as to what the simulations focused on? (ie. TSQL, SSMS, etc.) I can do just about everything you need to do in SSMS and other GUI tools, but I don't have all the full syntaxes for the TSQL methods memorized (ie. create HTTP endpoint for SOAP vs. TCP endpoint for mirroring).

|||

Well, this really isn't a database documentation request, and using a questions-only site really isn't the best way to go. There are reputable firms, such as Transcender, that will help you with testing and so on. The point is that you should try and learn the trade, rather than just memorizing questions. I've posted an article that deals with certifications:

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=131

And another here dealing with being a DBA. I think you may find those more useful than looking up test questions on a site.

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=247

These are just my thoughts - I do wish you luck in your studies!

|||

Many thanks, Abdul, for that "heads up".

If you or anyone else here come to know of any test exams based on this new pattern I am sure we all would be eager to know about them as soon as possible.

Regards

70-431 (MCTS - SQL 2005)

Hi,

Somebody can speak (tips) about exam 70-431?

Tips?

Amount Questions?

Time ?

....

Check out http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-431.asp

Also check out the following discussion groups @. http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.certification&cat=en_US_9a063422-2f7f-42b6-875e-3e94866bb44f&lang=en&cr=US

Thanks,
Loonysan

70-431 (MCTS - SQL 2005)

Hi,

Somebody can speak (tips) about exam 70-431?

Tips?

Amount Questions?

Time ?

....

If you're looking for brain dumps this is not the site to get those answers. The 70-431 exam is a 200-level "how-to" exam on all the nuts and bolts of SQL Server 2005. There are free eLearning classes available on the Microsoft web site which will help you with the content information for the test, as well as a number of excellent books hitting the market about now.

I believe you'll get about 40 questions on the test, though it may be higher than that, and you'll get about 2 1/2 hours to answer them.

Go to www.microsoft.com/sql and click on Learning and you'll find out all you need to know to prepare for the test.

Good luck.

|||

What is the passing mark/percentage for MCTS?

|||

Hi Gunny,

is 700 scored.

|||

E X A M S P E C S
Exam Number: 70-431
Active / Retired: Active
Prerequisites:
Exam Format: Multiple-Choice; Multiple Answer
Num Questions: 55
Time Limit: 90
Cost (USD) $: $125
Passing Score: 700

taken from cramsession's site: http://www.cramsession.com/certifications/exams/sql-server-2005.asp?exam_id=770

also use this code for 20% of the exam price

Call now to schedule your Microsoft exam call 1-800-247-8731 and use code MSUU5C7E0100 for your 20% discount.

|||

Many thanks WPH and rkohler.

That's 700 out of how many? What is the max possible score?

|||1000 max scored.|||

Thanks WPH.

|||

any one can respon

i have two server one is dpmain controller and second is exchange 2003 server i need to setup sql 2005

which one i choice ?

|||

a.m.m.e.

Your question really belongs in a separate/new thread. This thread is about MCTS.

But to answer your question, I would advise against putting it on the domain controller. The domain controller contains the Active Directory and security is extremely important. Adding any other role such as SQL Server would complicate security configuration for it.

Actually, if possible, I would set up a new dedicated SQL Server - not add it to the Exchange Server 2003. Mixing multiple roles on one server always complicates security. But if you cannot set up a new dedicated server I would add it to the Exchange Server 2003.

Other more experienced people may have different ideas.

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Hello everyone,

I would like to let you all know and be aware of the fact that microsoft has changed its exam pattern for

070-431 be very carefull as microsoft has changed the exam pattern and due to which i failed the exam today.

Its now based on simulations questions which comes after the multiple choice questions i got 15 simulations

separately apart from 35 multi choice questions along with exibits. I wasnt aware of this fact and it wasnt

mentioned ánywhere about simulations questions I think no one knows about it I am the first to face this type of

exam.. The exams comes up with 2 sections the first sections was questions that was 35 in 1hr and the next

was simulations that was 15 2hr 15mins so in total it was 195min exam and I got all correct in first section

and the second section was gred out 60% I got 560 out of 700 may not be difficult but very new.

If in case you have come across with any good site with simulations of this exam please forward me to

a_afroze@.yahoo.com

All the best to all of you

Abdul Afroze

|||

Thanks for the information. I'm going to be taking the test soon and was afraid they would do something like this. They did this to me on the 70-228... completely changed the content and format from what my rather expensive test prep materials were based on.

Could you give us a clue as to what the simulations focused on? (ie. TSQL, SSMS, etc.) I can do just about everything you need to do in SSMS and other GUI tools, but I don't have all the full syntaxes for the TSQL methods memorized (ie. create HTTP endpoint for SOAP vs. TCP endpoint for mirroring).

|||

Well, this really isn't a database documentation request, and using a questions-only site really isn't the best way to go. There are reputable firms, such as Transcender, that will help you with testing and so on. The point is that you should try and learn the trade, rather than just memorizing questions. I've posted an article that deals with certifications:

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=131

And another here dealing with being a DBA. I think you may find those more useful than looking up test questions on a site.

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=247

These are just my thoughts - I do wish you luck in your studies!

|||

Many thanks, Abdul, for that "heads up".

If you or anyone else here come to know of any test exams based on this new pattern I am sure we all would be eager to know about them as soon as possible.

Regards

70-229 sql exam

please help me to find a link that i can download the 70-229 sql v3.1 exam with no payment.Did you try this one:

http://www.mcsebraindumps.com/70-229-braindumps.htm|||Here...give this a read...

http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=32178

70-229 Microsoft example

I am studying for the 70--229 microsoft exam using the MS study guide. An example of a stored procedure used to add customer and check for dupes is below. However although the dupelicatecheck sp is called duplicate contact's can be added. Can anyone give me advise on where I may have gone wrong with this example.

CREATE procedure dbo.addcustomer
@.firstname varchar(30)='Unknown',
@.lastname varchar(30)='Unknown', @.Phone varchar(24)= NULL,
@.Address1 varchar(60)= NULL,
@.address2 varchar(60)='unknown', @.city varchar(15)=Null,
@.state varchar(7)=Null, @.zip varchar(12)=NULL
as
IF (@.Firstname='Unknown') and (@.Lastname='Unknown')
return(1)

Else IF @.phone is null
return(2)
Else IF
@.Address1 is null or @.city is null or
@.state is null or @.zip is null
Return(3)
--begin nesting
declare @.r_code int, @.v_firstname varchar(30),
@.v_lastname varchar(30), @.v_city varchar(15),
@.v_state varchar(7), @.v_phone varchar(24)
execute @.r_code=dbo.checkforduplicatecustomer
@.1_firstname=@.firstname, @.1_lastname=@.lastname,
@.1_city=city, @.1_state=@.state, @.1_phone=@.phone,
@.o_firstname=@.v_firstname output,
@.o_lastname=@.v_lastname output, @.o_city=@.v_city output,
@.o_state=@.v_state output, @.o_phone=@.v_phone output
if @.@.rowcount>0
begin
Print'A duplicate record was found for' + @.v_firstname+' ' +
@.v_lastname
print 'in' +@.v_city + ' '+ @.v_state + ' with a phone number'
print 'of' + @.v_phone +','
return(5)
end
--end nesting
insert [bookshopdb].[dbo].[customers]
(firstname, lastname, phone,
address1, address2, city, state, zip)
values
(@.firstname, @.lastname, @.phone,
@.address1, @.address2, @.city, @.state, @.zip)
Return(select @.@.identity as 'identity')
if @.@.error <>0
return (4)

create procedure dbo.checkforduplicatecustomer
@.1_firstname varchar(30)='Unknown',
@.1_Lastname varchar(30)='Unknown',
@.1_City varchar (15)= Null, @.1_state varchar(7)= null,
@.1_phone varchar(24)= null, @.o_firstname varchar (30) output,
@.o_lastname varchar(30) output, @.o_city varchar (15) output,
@.o_state varchar(7) output, @.o_phone varchar(24) output
as
select @.o_firstname=firstname, @.o_lastname=lastname,
@.o_city=city, @.o_state=state, @.o_phone=phone
from customers
where firstname=@.1_firstname and lastname=@.1_lastname
and city=@.1_city and state=@.1_state and phone=@.1_phone
if @.@.rowcount <> 0
return (5)You assign the output of checkforduplicatecustomer to variable @.r_code, but your main procedure checks that value of if @.@.rowcount to determine whether to generate a duplicate record error. Shouldn't you be checking @.r_code instead?

Also, you would be better off wrting your checkforduplicatecustomer procedure as a user-defined function. They are much easier to use in code, like this:
if dbo.checkforduplicatecustomer(Parameters...) = 1 begin....

And why don't you just check for duplicates in your main code using IF EXISTS? That would be the simplest way, unless you really need to reuse the duplicate checking logic in other procedures as well.

blindman

70-228 Exam Questions.

Hello all,
I am preparing for 70-228 (SQL server Administration) exam. I was looking on the internet for some exam oriented questions or question bank kind of thing. I found couple of them but those are not sufficient. I would appreciate if you could let me know if you know any sites where i can get some more questions to solve. I would really appreciate if anybody has a questions bank and would like to share it with me.
Thanking in advance.
MandarThere are tons of web sites with this material for your review. You can also purchase testing software like transcender. Also, if you don't already have sql server to use - get an eval copy.

70-228 Exam Book?

Hello
Can anyone suggest a good book for preparing 70-228? I found this
MCSA/MCSE/MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 Administration Study Guide (70-228) by
Sybex pub. But I am not sure about this really. Someone was really
praising Wrox - Professional SQL Server 2000 Programming. I have no
previous experience of SQL Server 2000, but I am comfortable with
programming and SQL language.
Thanks for your suggestions in advance.
Kappa
Hi
You may want to check out http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/books.mspx
you may also want to check out the (SQL 2005) e-learning courses at
https://www.microsoftelearning.com/c...aspx#sqlServer which are
currently being offered for free (till Nov 2006).
John
"Trying2Learn" wrote:

> Hello
>
> Can anyone suggest a good book for preparing 70-228? I found this
> MCSA/MCSE/MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 Administration Study Guide (70-228) by
> Sybex pub. But I am not sure about this really. Someone was really
> praising Wrox - Professional SQL Server 2000 Programming. I have no
> previous experience of SQL Server 2000, but I am comfortable with
> programming and SQL language.
>
> Thanks for your suggestions in advance.
>
> Kappa
>

70-228 Exam Book?

Hello
Can anyone suggest a good book for preparing 70-228? I found this
MCSA/MCSE/MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 Administration Study Guide (70-228) by
Sybex pub. But I am not sure about this really. Someone was really
praising Wrox - Professional SQL Server 2000 Programming. I have no
previous experience of SQL Server 2000, but I am comfortable with
programming and SQL language.
Thanks for your suggestions in advance.
KappaHi
You may want to check out http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/books.mspx
you may also want to check out the (SQL 2005) e-learning courses at
https://www.microsoftelearning.com/...aspx#sqlServer which are
currently being offered for free (till Nov 2006).
John
"Trying2Learn" wrote:

> Hello
>
> Can anyone suggest a good book for preparing 70-228? I found this
> MCSA/MCSE/MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 Administration Study Guide (70-228) by
> Sybex pub. But I am not sure about this really. Someone was really
> praising Wrox - Professional SQL Server 2000 Programming. I have no
> previous experience of SQL Server 2000, but I am comfortable with
> programming and SQL language.
>
> Thanks for your suggestions in advance.
>
> Kappa
>

70-228 Exam Book?

Hello
Can anyone suggest a good book for preparing 70-228? I found this
MCSA/MCSE/MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 Administration Study Guide (70-228) by
Sybex pub. But I am not sure about this really. Someone was really
praising Wrox - Professional SQL Server 2000 Programming. I have no
previous experience of SQL Server 2000, but I am comfortable with
programming and SQL language.
Thanks for your suggestions in advance.
KappaHi
You may want to check out http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/books.mspx
you may also want to check out the (SQL 2005) e-learning courses at
https://www.microsoftelearning.com/catalog/itproDev.aspx#sqlServer which are
currently being offered for free (till Nov 2006).
John
"Trying2Learn" wrote:
> Hello
>
> Can anyone suggest a good book for preparing 70-228? I found this
> MCSA/MCSE/MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 Administration Study Guide (70-228) by
> Sybex pub. But I am not sure about this really. Someone was really
> praising Wrox - Professional SQL Server 2000 Programming. I have no
> previous experience of SQL Server 2000, but I am comfortable with
> programming and SQL language.
>
> Thanks for your suggestions in advance.
>
> Kappa
>

64-bit Windows/64-bit SQL - External Drives

Hi,
I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
confirmation anywhere.
Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
restrictions on hardware?
If we want use 64-bit clustered system, are we basically forced to accept a
fibre-based SAN as I/O system?
Thank you.
CraigYour hardware for Cluster must be in the Hardware Compatibility List. Check
out the following site:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309395
--
Ekrem Ã?nsoy
"craig_amtdatatechnologies@.discussions.mi"
<craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsmi@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:25BEEEE9-2C79-4377-83D5-CAA0574273B2@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
> that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
> I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
> confirmation anywhere.
> Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
> restrictions on hardware?
> If we want use 64-bit clustered system, are we basically forced to accept
> a
> fibre-based SAN as I/O system?
>
> Thank you.
> Craig
>

64-bit Windows / 64-bit SQL - External Disk Array (cluster)

oops, post should have gone to this forum ....
Hi,
I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
confirmation anywhere.
Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
restrictions on hardware?
If we want to go 64-bit, are we basically forced to accept a fibre-based SAN
as I/O system?
Thank you.
Craig
Windows 2003 64-bit does not require fibre drives. You can use anything
internal for the nodes. The shared disk can be Parallel Attached SCSI
(though I would not), iSCSI or SAN based.
Now Windows 2008 will not support PAS, but it will support SAS, SAN, or
iSCSI.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"craig_amtdatatechnologies@.discussions.mi"
<craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsmi@.discussions .microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:B1B0C4B4-B45D-4217-AC25-3A2D7A4B362B@.microsoft.com...
> oops, post should have gone to this forum ....
> Hi,
> I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443),
> that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives?
> I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found
> confirmation anywhere.
> Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these
> restrictions on hardware?
> If we want to go 64-bit, are we basically forced to accept a fibre-based
> SAN
> as I/O system?
>
> Thank you.
> Craig
|||Thanks for reply re: this
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" wrote:

> Windows 2003 64-bit does not require fibre drives. You can use anything
> internal for the nodes. The shared disk can be Parallel Attached SCSI
> (though I would not), iSCSI or SAN based.
>
> Now Windows 2008 will not support PAS, but it will support SAS, SAN, or
> iSCSI.
> Cheers,
> Rodney R. Fournier
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
>
> "craig_amtdatatechnologies@.discussions.mi"
> <craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsmi@.discussions .microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:B1B0C4B4-B45D-4217-AC25-3A2D7A4B362B@.microsoft.com...
>
>